Discussion:
Why aren't liberals demanding a business boycott of San Francisco because of Colin Kaepernick's racist treason?
(too old to reply)
Ken Boyd
2017-03-02 09:50:34 UTC
Permalink
Why is a boycott okay in support of those who break the law, but
not those who encourage racism, treason and personal attacks on
their own country?
 
meport
2017-03-02 23:21:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ken Boyd
Why is a boycott okay in support of those who break the law, but
not those who encourage racism, treason and personal attacks on
their own country?
Because freedom of speech is permitted under the provisions of the 1st
Amendment of the US Constitution?????
--
--
---
meport
NEMO (not forging jew kike Sheinie hymie pedophile Barry)
2017-03-03 00:36:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by meport
Post by Ken Boyd
Why is a boycott okay in support of those who break the law, but
not those who encourage racism, treason and personal attacks on
their own country?
Because freedom of speech is permitted under the provisions of the 1st
Amendment of the US Constitution?????
No, because San Francissyco is a registered 'homopolis'®™ and liberals
LOVE sexual degenerates.
r***@gmail.com
2017-03-03 02:01:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by meport
Post by Ken Boyd
Why is a boycott okay in support of those who break the law, but
not those who encourage racism, treason and personal attacks on
their own country?
Because freedom of speech is permitted under the provisions of the 1st
Amendment of the US Constitution?????
--
indeed

redvet, who thinks liberals are wimps

Loading...